In landscape planning, which area is recommended for development?

In landscape planning, back dune areas are recommended for development primarily due to their relative stability and suitability for human activities. These areas tend to be less directly impacted by harsh coastal conditions compared to primary dune areas, which are more exposed and often subject to erosion and shifting sands.

Back dune areas usually provide a buffer against the elements, making them more suitable for structures. Additionally, they often have better soil conditions, which can support infrastructure and landscaping development. This consideration aligns with principles of sustainable development, which emphasize minimizing environmental impact while utilizing land effectively.

The other areas mentioned, such as primary dunes, secondary dunes, and low-lying wetlands, are generally less ideal for development. Primary dune areas are critical for coastal protection and biodiversity, while secondary dunes still offer similar ecological benefits and are often unstable. Low-lying wetlands are valuable ecosystems that provide flood control, wildlife habitat, and water quality improvement; thus, developing these areas would disrupt their ecological functions. Hence, back dune areas present a balanced option for development that meets both practical and environmental needs.